Saturday, November 22, 2014

Mystery Solved: There's Big Money in Harassing the Police

Ferguson
Bassem Masri videoing himself harassing officers in Ferguson

Well this certainly clears up why the protesters in Ferguson, and the agitators from out of town (Oakland), are willing to sleep in tents and storage facilities - the payoff could be millions, especially if they can harass the police into arresting or assaulting them.  Solves the mystery of why the police are being told not to pummel violent protesters like Bassem Masri.


  • 2004: New York City - $17.9 million to more than 1800  Republican National Convention protesters
  • Occupy protest Oakland, California: An Iraq War veteran injured by police - $4.5 million (struck in the head by beanbag fired by police)
  • November 2011: UC Davis Occupy - $1 million to 21 protesters who were pepper sprayed.  $30,000 per demonstrator, $250,000 in attorney fees.  The officer who pepper sprayed was fired.
  • Occupy Oakland: $1.1 million to protesters -Police misconduct 
  • Occupy Wall Street March: New York - $580,000 to 14 protesters who were wrongfully arrested 
  • New Hampshire:  Woman $57,000 for arrest stemming from videotaping a police stop.

These awards are in the context of much higher awards nationally for police misconduct. Chicago paid out $84 million in settlements for police abuse cases in 2013 alone.  Los Angeles paid out $54 million in settlements for police brutality in 2011. Bloomberg News estimated New York City has paid out as much as $735 million for police abuse claims in one year. [link]
 

1 comment :

  1. ICYMI....Delusional Judy is now begging for cash http://www.gofundme.com/hp8ix4

    ReplyDelete

PLEASE do not write multiple comments -posts to blogs older than 60 days are moderated. I only moderate for spam, you are entitled to your opinion as long as you don't yell fire up in here.

We are not obliged to publish your comments but if we do, you understand that other users are free to add further comments to yours either supporting or countering any views you may have expressed. We are not responsible for any opinions expressed in comments that we publish. We will remove any comment as we see fit. If a published comment is subsequently brought to our attention that contravenes the conditions set out in our disclaimer, we will remove it and take further action as appropriate. You retain copyright of and are solely responsible for your own comments. You are responsible for any actions that may be taken against you in response to comments you have made.